Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Duke Outslugs Scrappy Butler, 61-59, to Win 4th N.C.A.A. Title

Ace! NewsFlash

Duke’s Jon Scheyer (30) and Lance Thomas celebrated after winning the national championship.

INDIANAPOLIS — The dark sky, tornado warnings and pelting rain here Monday night portended something ominous. The backdrop all week at the Final Four had been one of change, a feeling that the tournament as it has existed for the past quarter-century could be forever altered.

And the championship matchup between Duke and Butler offered theN.C.A.A., in Butler’s hometown, a reminder on the largest stage of the quintessential joy of this tournament. Butler — with the disparity in traditions, budgets and name recognition — represented the best of the tournament. But as tournament history has shown, the best team often wins. Behind Kyle Singler’s stellar defensive effort and game-high 19 points, Duke won its fourth title, 61-59.

Duke (35-5) outslugged scrappy Butler, which had won 25 consecutive games, in a tense, edge-of-your-couch game with 5 ties, 15 lead changes and 2 potentially game-winning shots by Butler that caromed out in the final five seconds. “This was a great basketball game,” said the Duke CoachMike Krzyzewski. “I want to congratulate an amazing Butler team. We played a great game and they played a great game.”

Butler’s first chance came when the sophomore forward Gordon Hayward missed a fading 14-foot baseline jump shot with Butler trailing, 60-59. Duke center Brian Zoubek got a hand in Hayward’s face, was fouled after the miss and hit one of two free throws. Hayward rebounded the miss, which was intentional, but his last-chance, half-court gasp hit the backboard and barely front-rimmed out. He collapsed on the floor, spoiling an ending that would make even Bobby Plump, the real-life Jimmy Chitwood in the film “Hoosiers,” blush. “They played good defense and forced me into a tough shot,” Hayward said. “I thought it was a good shot for us. Just missed it long. The last shot it was just a last-second shot and, I don’t know, it missed.”

Since the tournament expanded in 1985, there has been no more dominant sideline figure than Mike Krzyzewski, who tied Adolph Rupp for second in N.C.A.A. championships with his fourth. Krzyzewski’s presence in his 30th season at Duke offered a stark contrast to the 33-year old Butler Coach Brad Stevens, who looks as calm as he does young. But Stevens could not conjure up collegiate version of “Hoosiers,” as Singler and Lance Thomas limited Hayward to 2-for-11 shooting and 12 points. Krzyzewski showed he could still mold a team as well as anyone. Duke guarded with a slap-the-floor ferocity that long defined the program, scored twice in the second half on delightfully designed inbounds plays and battled through second-half foul trouble to the starting big men, Zoubek and Thomas. “It was obviously a physical game,” Hayward said. “They played hard and we played hard. I feel like we pretty much left it all out there.”

Duke’s big three — Singler, Jon Scheyer and Nolan Smith — led them again. Singler drained silky jumpers out of intricate sets, Scheyer capped a dynamic senior year with 15 points and Smith played steadily and scored 13. Zoubek proved a terror on the boards, with 11 rebounds and made the game’s best defensive play. Among Duke titles, this one, the Blue Devils’ first since 2001, will resonate as one of its most improbable. The 1991 team had to slay a mighty and undefeated Nevada-Las Vegas team. But this edition lacks a sure-fire high first-round draft pick like Bobby Hurley, Grant Hill or Elton Brand of teams past. Duke won with synergy and teamwork more than an overwhelming roster of talent. It held Butler to 34.5 percent shooting and stayed poised down the stretch after two Matt Howard field goals cut the Duke lead to a point in the final minute.

This was Duke’s 10th appearance in the finals, Butler’s first. The Blue Devils have an endowment of nearly $6 billion more than Butler and spent more than $12 million more on basketball in the latest data available from the United States Department of Education. Butler, with just under 4,000 undergraduates, was aiming to became the smallest college by enrollment to win the national title since Holy Cross in 1947.

“Can it get better than these guys?” Stevens asked. “They came one shot away from the national championship.” Even with the loss, the epic nature of the title game and Butler’s delightful run cemented the team in N.C.A.A. tournament lore. But that didn’t dull the pain for Butler. “For me it’s going to be the loss,” Hayward said of the take-away from the game. “I hate losing. It's one of the worst feelings that I have is losing.”

The occasionally grinding pace of the first half favored Butler, even though the Bulldogs trailed at the break, 33-32. Butler played large portions of the first half without point guard Ronald Nored, its best on-the-ball defender, and Howard. Nored played only seven minutes in the first half and Howard nine. Howard’s status was in question after he sustained a concussion Saturday night againstMichigan State. Howard picked up his second foul 11 minutes into the game, and he did not look particularly good in the time he played. He missed all four of his first-half shots from the field and three of four free throws.

Every potentially magical college basketball story needs an unlikely hero. For Butler, the reserve forward Avery Jukes emerged as that player in the first half. If the scouting report had advised the Blue Devils to lay off Jukes, no one would have blamed them. He was averaging 2.7 points and had not scored 10 points in a game since Dec. 5 against Valparaiso. In the five previous N.C.A.A. tournament games, he had scored 6 points. But at halftime he had 10, more than any other player on the floor. But Jukes’s first half scoring explosion will only be a small footnote on this night.

Instead, the Butler players trudged off the floor in their hometown as losers of a taut and epic one-possession games. Krzyzewski called the game “the toughest and the best one” of the eight national championship games he’s coached in. “Butler University has been on a stage that’s hard to put into words,” Stevens said. “More importantly for the 15 guys in that locker room. It’s the last time they’ll play together. They’ll have it for a long, long time.”

And as change comes to the N.C.A.A. tournament as this generation has known it, this game that perhaps ended an era may be the best one of it.


***
Ace! is a member of the EducationUSA global educational advising network affiliated with the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State. We provide free EducationUSA counseling services to students in the northern provinces of Thailand; our faculty of U.S.-trained Test Prep Experts can help you with cost-effective result-driven training programs for SAT-1, SAT-2, TOEFL, GRE, GMAT, GED, IELTS etc ***

International Grad Applications Up for U.S. Universities

Ace! NewsFlash

Applications from outside the United States are up 7 percent in 2010 at American graduate schools, a healthy increase that will please many universities, according to a new survey released by the Council of Graduate Schools.

But the increases are uneven. Continuing a trend from last year, the three countries that send the largest numbers of foreign graduate students to the United States are experiencing distinctly different patterns, with the numbers from China way up, while India and South Korea are flat. Programs at doctoral institutions are seeing increases, while master's universities are encountering drops. And the application increases are largest at institutions with the most international students already enrolled, suggesting that among institutions trying to increase their international enrollments, it may be easier to build on success than to create a critical mass.

The 7 percent total gain for 2009-10 is up from the council's final analyses of previous years, which found gains of 4 percent in applications the prior year and 6 percent the year before that. While applications do not necessarily yield enrollment gains, universities that rely on foreign graduate students have been pushing hard for application gains, given that competition has increased for the best foreign talent, with countries like Australia, Britain and Canada -- as well as home-country universities -- bidding for some of the best students.

Trends over the past four years in students' country of origin and discipline show some consistencies: Applications continue to soar from China and the Middle East. But other countries and some disciplines are less consistent from year to year.

Changes in International Graduate Applications, 2006-10

2006 to 20072007 to 20082008 to 20092009 to 2010
Total+9%+6%+4%+7%
Country of Origin
--China+19%+11%+14%+19%
--India+12%+2%-12%-2%
--South Korea+0%+2%-9%+0%
--Middle East and Turkey+17%+14%+22%+18%
By Field of Study
--Arts and humanities+8%+7%+5%+6%
--Business+15%+10%+7%+8%
--Education+12%-1%+8%+8%
--Engineering+13%+4%+3%+7%
--Life sciences+18%+3%+0%+3%
--Physical and earth sciences+12%+7%+2%+10%
--Social sciences+0%+9%+6%+11%

The survey also noted differences in the trends by sector. Among doctoral universities, the rate of increase in applications at private institutions outpaced the rate of increase at publics, 12 percent to 6 percent. And among master's institutions, the decreases were smaller at private institution than publics, -10 percent to -22 percent. The Council of Graduate Schools report cautions against reading too much into the master's institution decline, given that a relatively small percentage of international students apply to such programs, making large fluctuations likely.

The study also shows the extent to which the best way to attract more international applications is to already have more international students. Among the 100 institutions with the largest international enrollments, the average increase in applications this year was 8 percent. Among all other colleges, the figure was 4 percent. Analyzed by country or region of origin, it appears that this centralization of interest has the strongest impact on Chinese applicants.

Change in International Applications by Size of Current International Enrollments, 2009 to 2010

Place of Origin10 Largest Institutions100 Largest InstitutionsAll Other Institutions
China+25%+19%+19%
India+6%+1%-14%
South Korea-4%-1%+14%
Middle East and Turkey-1%+13%+40%

Nathan Bell, director of research and policy analysis for the Council of Graduate Schools, noted that the survey doesn't produce definitive information on why some countries are sending more applications than others. However, with regard to China, he said that the consistent double-digit percentage increases are widely understood. "There is a rapid increase in degree production at the undergraduate level in China, and there is a capacity issue in which they can't accommodate the numbers of students who want a graduate education," he said.

As for the larger increases at institutions that already have many foreign students, Bell said that these tend to be institutions with large enrollments (of all students), making them more likely to have name recognition abroad; and, too, foreign would-be students are more likely "to know someone there."


*** Ace! is a member of the EducationUSA global educational advising network affiliated with the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State. We provide free EducationUSA counseling services to students in the northern provinces of Thailand; our faculty of U.S.-trained Test Prep Experts can help you with cost-effective result-driven training programs for SAT-1, SAT-2, TOEFL, GRE, GMAT, GED, IELTS etc ***